CQC provider compliance workflow

Check whether an event may need CQC statutory notification

Use structured facts to prepare a cautious notification preflight for an already-operating or registered provider. This is informational compliance support, not legal advice or a CQC determination.

What this check does

  1. Checks whether the structured information is sufficient to assess the selected event.
  2. Flags when the existing deterministic decision may need manual review.
  3. Offers a separate checkout-intent step for an evidence-linked report. No card details are collected.

No names, incident narratives, email addresses or payment credentials are requested by this experiment.

Example report

This synthetic example shows the existing response shape. It is not a decision about your case.

status
REVIEW
notification_type
serious_injury
route
review_serious_injury_assault_route
results
Decision rule, reason, blocking flag and evidence IDs
evidence
Source ID, title, URL, publisher and last-checked fields
warnings
Review flags and missing route discriminators
disclaimer
Informational preflight only; not CQC approval or legal advice.

Start with structured facts

Only fields already supported by the CQC statutory-notification engine are used. Unclear facts should be left unsupplied where allowed; the engine is designed to fail closed to review.

Structured case facts

For the fields below, choose Yes or No when relevant to the selected event. Leave unrelated fields unsupplied; unclear facts may lead to review.

Machine integrations continue to use the existing x402-protected statutory-notification route and existing pricing. The human-report price is confirmed before payment.